197 lines
6.9 KiB
JavaScript
197 lines
6.9 KiB
JavaScript
|
/**
|
||
|
* @fileoverview Rule to flag fall-through cases in switch statements.
|
||
|
* @author Matt DuVall <http://mattduvall.com/>
|
||
|
*/
|
||
|
"use strict";
|
||
|
|
||
|
//------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|
||
|
// Requirements
|
||
|
//------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|
||
|
|
||
|
const { directivesPattern } = require("../shared/directives");
|
||
|
|
||
|
//------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|
||
|
// Helpers
|
||
|
//------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|
||
|
|
||
|
const DEFAULT_FALLTHROUGH_COMMENT = /falls?\s?through/iu;
|
||
|
|
||
|
/**
|
||
|
* Checks all segments in a set and returns true if any are reachable.
|
||
|
* @param {Set<CodePathSegment>} segments The segments to check.
|
||
|
* @returns {boolean} True if any segment is reachable; false otherwise.
|
||
|
*/
|
||
|
function isAnySegmentReachable(segments) {
|
||
|
|
||
|
for (const segment of segments) {
|
||
|
if (segment.reachable) {
|
||
|
return true;
|
||
|
}
|
||
|
}
|
||
|
|
||
|
return false;
|
||
|
}
|
||
|
|
||
|
/**
|
||
|
* Checks whether or not a given comment string is really a fallthrough comment and not an ESLint directive.
|
||
|
* @param {string} comment The comment string to check.
|
||
|
* @param {RegExp} fallthroughCommentPattern The regular expression used for checking for fallthrough comments.
|
||
|
* @returns {boolean} `true` if the comment string is truly a fallthrough comment.
|
||
|
*/
|
||
|
function isFallThroughComment(comment, fallthroughCommentPattern) {
|
||
|
return fallthroughCommentPattern.test(comment) && !directivesPattern.test(comment.trim());
|
||
|
}
|
||
|
|
||
|
/**
|
||
|
* Checks whether or not a given case has a fallthrough comment.
|
||
|
* @param {ASTNode} caseWhichFallsThrough SwitchCase node which falls through.
|
||
|
* @param {ASTNode} subsequentCase The case after caseWhichFallsThrough.
|
||
|
* @param {RuleContext} context A rule context which stores comments.
|
||
|
* @param {RegExp} fallthroughCommentPattern A pattern to match comment to.
|
||
|
* @returns {boolean} `true` if the case has a valid fallthrough comment.
|
||
|
*/
|
||
|
function hasFallthroughComment(caseWhichFallsThrough, subsequentCase, context, fallthroughCommentPattern) {
|
||
|
const sourceCode = context.sourceCode;
|
||
|
|
||
|
if (caseWhichFallsThrough.consequent.length === 1 && caseWhichFallsThrough.consequent[0].type === "BlockStatement") {
|
||
|
const trailingCloseBrace = sourceCode.getLastToken(caseWhichFallsThrough.consequent[0]);
|
||
|
const commentInBlock = sourceCode.getCommentsBefore(trailingCloseBrace).pop();
|
||
|
|
||
|
if (commentInBlock && isFallThroughComment(commentInBlock.value, fallthroughCommentPattern)) {
|
||
|
return true;
|
||
|
}
|
||
|
}
|
||
|
|
||
|
const comment = sourceCode.getCommentsBefore(subsequentCase).pop();
|
||
|
|
||
|
return Boolean(comment && isFallThroughComment(comment.value, fallthroughCommentPattern));
|
||
|
}
|
||
|
|
||
|
/**
|
||
|
* Checks whether a node and a token are separated by blank lines
|
||
|
* @param {ASTNode} node The node to check
|
||
|
* @param {Token} token The token to compare against
|
||
|
* @returns {boolean} `true` if there are blank lines between node and token
|
||
|
*/
|
||
|
function hasBlankLinesBetween(node, token) {
|
||
|
return token.loc.start.line > node.loc.end.line + 1;
|
||
|
}
|
||
|
|
||
|
//------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|
||
|
// Rule Definition
|
||
|
//------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|
||
|
|
||
|
/** @type {import('../shared/types').Rule} */
|
||
|
module.exports = {
|
||
|
meta: {
|
||
|
type: "problem",
|
||
|
|
||
|
docs: {
|
||
|
description: "Disallow fallthrough of `case` statements",
|
||
|
recommended: true,
|
||
|
url: "https://eslint.org/docs/latest/rules/no-fallthrough"
|
||
|
},
|
||
|
|
||
|
schema: [
|
||
|
{
|
||
|
type: "object",
|
||
|
properties: {
|
||
|
commentPattern: {
|
||
|
type: "string",
|
||
|
default: ""
|
||
|
},
|
||
|
allowEmptyCase: {
|
||
|
type: "boolean",
|
||
|
default: false
|
||
|
}
|
||
|
},
|
||
|
additionalProperties: false
|
||
|
}
|
||
|
],
|
||
|
messages: {
|
||
|
case: "Expected a 'break' statement before 'case'.",
|
||
|
default: "Expected a 'break' statement before 'default'."
|
||
|
}
|
||
|
},
|
||
|
|
||
|
create(context) {
|
||
|
const options = context.options[0] || {};
|
||
|
const codePathSegments = [];
|
||
|
let currentCodePathSegments = new Set();
|
||
|
const sourceCode = context.sourceCode;
|
||
|
const allowEmptyCase = options.allowEmptyCase || false;
|
||
|
|
||
|
/*
|
||
|
* We need to use leading comments of the next SwitchCase node because
|
||
|
* trailing comments is wrong if semicolons are omitted.
|
||
|
*/
|
||
|
let fallthroughCase = null;
|
||
|
let fallthroughCommentPattern = null;
|
||
|
|
||
|
if (options.commentPattern) {
|
||
|
fallthroughCommentPattern = new RegExp(options.commentPattern, "u");
|
||
|
} else {
|
||
|
fallthroughCommentPattern = DEFAULT_FALLTHROUGH_COMMENT;
|
||
|
}
|
||
|
return {
|
||
|
|
||
|
onCodePathStart() {
|
||
|
codePathSegments.push(currentCodePathSegments);
|
||
|
currentCodePathSegments = new Set();
|
||
|
},
|
||
|
|
||
|
onCodePathEnd() {
|
||
|
currentCodePathSegments = codePathSegments.pop();
|
||
|
},
|
||
|
|
||
|
onUnreachableCodePathSegmentStart(segment) {
|
||
|
currentCodePathSegments.add(segment);
|
||
|
},
|
||
|
|
||
|
onUnreachableCodePathSegmentEnd(segment) {
|
||
|
currentCodePathSegments.delete(segment);
|
||
|
},
|
||
|
|
||
|
onCodePathSegmentStart(segment) {
|
||
|
currentCodePathSegments.add(segment);
|
||
|
},
|
||
|
|
||
|
onCodePathSegmentEnd(segment) {
|
||
|
currentCodePathSegments.delete(segment);
|
||
|
},
|
||
|
|
||
|
|
||
|
SwitchCase(node) {
|
||
|
|
||
|
/*
|
||
|
* Checks whether or not there is a fallthrough comment.
|
||
|
* And reports the previous fallthrough node if that does not exist.
|
||
|
*/
|
||
|
|
||
|
if (fallthroughCase && (!hasFallthroughComment(fallthroughCase, node, context, fallthroughCommentPattern))) {
|
||
|
context.report({
|
||
|
messageId: node.test ? "case" : "default",
|
||
|
node
|
||
|
});
|
||
|
}
|
||
|
fallthroughCase = null;
|
||
|
},
|
||
|
|
||
|
"SwitchCase:exit"(node) {
|
||
|
const nextToken = sourceCode.getTokenAfter(node);
|
||
|
|
||
|
/*
|
||
|
* `reachable` meant fall through because statements preceded by
|
||
|
* `break`, `return`, or `throw` are unreachable.
|
||
|
* And allows empty cases and the last case.
|
||
|
*/
|
||
|
if (isAnySegmentReachable(currentCodePathSegments) &&
|
||
|
(node.consequent.length > 0 || (!allowEmptyCase && hasBlankLinesBetween(node, nextToken))) &&
|
||
|
node.parent.cases[node.parent.cases.length - 1] !== node) {
|
||
|
fallthroughCase = node;
|
||
|
}
|
||
|
}
|
||
|
};
|
||
|
}
|
||
|
};
|